15 Cops Set Themselves Up For The PERFECT LAWSUIT!

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/252NA7Tu7PNiIypGkel5O3?si=bEeqVPirSJupYPuFD76IzQ

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/audittheaudit1

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Third channel: youtube.com/channel/UCmc4biDadYIwhBctWd1ESuA/

Submit your video here: https://forms.gle/FyrRquHvYtgjUDAw7

Get The Civilian Rights Handguide here: https://a.co/d/aDvE0xL

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@fixated.com

For collaborations: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

00:00 – Incident Overview

03:15 – Initial stop

10:40 – Constitutional Rights

18:25 – Fourth Amendment

25:10 – Officer Conduct

30:35 – Final Grades

DISCLAIMER

This video is for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing in this video should be construed as legal advice. I am not an attorney, and the content of this video does not create an attorney-client relationship. All legal commentary is based on publicly available information and is presented for general analysis, not personal guidance. Viewers should consult a licensed attorney for advice specific to their legal situation. The views expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any individuals or institutions shown. This video is not intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer, and does not promote unlawful behavior. It is created solely to inform the public about constitutional rights, law enforcement practices, and police accountability.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction.

FAIR USE

This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Sources:

Graham v. Connor- https://bit.ly/3vk7YaX

Courson v. McMillian- https://bit.ly/3WsxQn4

Jackson v. Sauls- https://bit.ly/4B9PYSE

Hunter v. State- https://bit.ly/4hWbj9u

United States v. Johnson- https://bit.ly/4jZ9Y4b

United States v. Roper- https://bit.ly/4yqnaCZ